Principles for good data visualisation

In this section, we present guiding principles to improve your chart design. We encourage TASO partners to implement these principles when designing charts. Applying these principles may vary depending on specific contexts and needs, but keeping them in mind can help make your charts more impactful and communicate your ideas more effectively.

Choosing your chart

When deciding on a chart, remember the core message you intend to convey. If summarising your chart’s point takes more than a few sentences, you may need to reconsider your choice. The Visual Vocabulary tool by the Financial Times is a valuable resource for selecting the right chart and sparking creative ideas.1 Consider your audience when making your selection – what works well in a technical report may not resonate as effectively in a webinar or blog post. Remember, charts are more than data points; they are narratives designed to tell a compelling story, prioritising clarity over exhaustive detail.

RAISE principles - summary

These principles are adapted from the key steps for better data visualisation set out by Jonathan Schwabish.2 Keep them in mind when designing charts to help make them as engaging as possible:

  1. Reduce the clutter: excessive chart elements, such as dense gridlines, or superfluous tick marks and labels, can reduce the effectiveness of a chart.

  2. Annotate: consider including explanatory text to help the audience understand how to interpret the visualisation, guiding them through the content.

  3. Integrate the text: where feasible, incorporate legends directly into the chart and use active titles that capture the primary takeaway. If articulating the key message is challenging, you may need to reassess your choice of chart.

  4. Show the data: consider highlighting the values that are more important to your argument, particularly if there is a lot of information on the chart. This helps ensure the audience focuses on the most pertinent data points.

  5. Engage the audience: thoughtfully assess the chart’s context and consider how to effectively engage the audience. A chart extracted from a technical report may not translate as effectively in a webinar or blog post and may demand adaptation.

Reduce the clutter

Start with the principle of making charts as simple and stripped back as possible, and gradually incorporate elements as needed. Unnecessary and distracting visual components can compromise the overall effectiveness of your visualisation.

  • Text should almost always be horizontal. Sometimes it may be worth considering the format of the chart to incorporate this, such as horizontal bars instead of vertical.

  • Consider if you can label data points directly – if you can label all data points, you may be able to drop axis labels.

  • Consider if axis titles need to be included. For example, if the X-axis shows ‘2013, 2014, 2015’, there is no need to add ‘Year’ as the X-axis title.

  • Consider how many gridlines are helpful – too few can mean they are not useful, and too many can make the chart cluttered.

  • Do not use unnecessary elements like colour gradients or 3D effects.

Annotate

Consider using annotations if they will help tell the story of the data. They can be used to highlight key information and support your analysis, bridging the gap between raw data and interpretation, and guiding the reader’s thinking process. They can also add context, if there are outliers, peaks or troughs, or if the chart type is unfamiliar to the reader.

  • Relevance is key – ensure that annotations directly contribute to the narrative of the data. Avoid unnecessary or excessive annotations that could confuse the reader. Use them selectively to emphasise key insights.

  • Make annotations concise, and place them near the relevant data points.

  • Ensure they are distinct from other elements of the chart, such as through font size or weight.

Integrate the text

Active titles

The choice of a chart title is often contextual, influenced by factors such as the nature of the content and any constraints posed by technical reports or academic papers. In general, opt for an active title that succinctly captures the key takeaway, complemented by a formal statistical subtitle. Titling charts in this way can make them more memorable and easier to digest. For more on why we think this is a more effective way to title charts, please see this blog post by the Office for National Statistics.3

Example of best practice for chart titles and subtitles

Title: Students with mental health difficulties consistently have the highest anxiety

Subtitle: Figure 18: Average anxiety level over time by disability type

This is traditionally the most common way of titling charts, but can be less helpful than an active title

Title: Fig. 18: Average anxiety level over time by disability type

Integrate the legend

Integrating the legend into the chart aids reader interpretation, creating a smoother, more intuitive experience. With an integrated legend, viewers do not need to shift their focus between the visualisation and a separate legend, which can be particularly difficult when there are multiple, similar colours involved.

Show the data

Consider highlighting the values that are most important to your argument. You don’t need to show all the data all of the time, as this can make it hard to see the data that matters most. For example, for line charts, try to have no more than four or five different colours.

You can change the properties of parts of the chart – such as by selectively using colour, shape and saturation – to guide a reader’s attention and make parts of a chart stand out.

Engage the audience

Strive to make your visualisation as engaging as possible. Capturing the reader’s attention ensures that your message is not only seen but also comprehended and remembered. Engaging visuals spark curiosity, encouraging a deeper exploration and analysis of the data. This connection leads to a more profound understanding of the insights you are sharing.

Guidance for common chart types

Bar charts

  • Bar charts should always start at zero.

  • Order bars by their values, unless there is a logical order, such as level of qualification or date.

  • Consider directly labelling data points and removing gridlines if there are only a few bars in your chart.

  • As text should be horizontal, a horizontal bar chart may be more appropriate when your axis labels are long.

Line charts

  • Try not to use more than five lines on a single chart. Including too many lines can make the chart confusing, particularly when they cross over at multiple points.

    • If you need to include more than this, consider splitting your chart into small multiples (also known as faceting or panel charts).

    • Alternatively, consider highlighting selected lines of interest and greying the rest out. This makes clear the line of interest while still enabling readers to easily see how it compares to other lines.

  • Try to integrate the legend and label lines directly, so readers do not have to match the colours from the line to the legend, as in the example on the right below.

Pie charts

  • Generally, we find that bar charts are more effective than pie charts, as it can be hard to discern the difference in size between different segments.

  • Pie charts can be particularly difficult to read when values are close, or if there are multiple segments.

  • Consider whether another chart type may be more appropriate. However, this is a rule of thumb and pie charts can be used, but do so with caution.

Back to top

Footnotes

  1. Financial Times. 2019. Visual vocabulary. https://ft-interactive.github.io/visualvocabulary/ [Accessed 21 November 2023]↩︎

  2. Schwabish, J. 2021. Better data visualizations: A guide for scholars, researchers, and wonks. Columbia University Press.↩︎

  3. Donnarumma, F. 2019. Say what you see - the way we write chart titles is changing. https://digitalblog.ons.gov.uk/2019/01/28/say-what-you-see-the-way-we-write-charttitles-is-changing/ [Accessed 21 November 2023]↩︎